A short survey on how cloud workloads are placed at the moment of first deployment, and what would have to change for low-carbon regions to become the default.
We are studying a simple question: across global electricity grids, a small set of regions remains persistently low-carbon year-round — yet most cloud workloads continue to run in regions with substantially dirtier grids. This survey asks why.
The focus is the first placement decision — the choice of region or zone when a workload is initially deployed — not runtime relocation, time-shifting, or workload portability. Five short questions, around three minutes.
Anonymity and data use. Responses are stored pseudonymously (no name, email, or IP address is collected). Data are used exclusively for the academic publication described above and for any directly derived follow-up work. You may close this tab at any time without consequence; partial responses are discarded.
Your response has been recorded. The full results, including the underlying carbon-intensity analysis, will be made available alongside the paper in mid-2027.
If you have colleagues who also influence region-selection decisions, please consider forwarding this survey to them — the value of the study scales with respondent diversity.